new photo blog

i started this blog in 2006, and it's shifted along with my interests through the years. it's been witness to a lot of learning for me...

still, i feel that i need a home for my photography -- so from now on, i'll be posting my pictures on the journal on my reworked website. if you like my photos, you might decide to follow me there!

my first post is here -- check it out!

as for this blog, i'm not sure what will happen. i don't think i'm willing to let it go, and certainly i'll keep it as an archive, but i need some time to figure it out.

for those of you that pop in from time to time, thanks for the visits and encouragement.

Sunday, February 10, 2013

what i think of the canon eos 6D

i have been wanting a full-frame camera for years, and there was no patience left in me. in greece’s economy, there was no way i could afford the 5DMIII. i had pretty much decided on 5DMII, when my good friend andre appel suggested that i wait for the 6D. that i did, as good reviews were trickling in.

i’m the proud owner of a canon eos 6D for about 6 weeks now, and have experienced a variety of shooting conditions, so i feel i have something to offer as an informal review. i don’t have extensive experience with many cameras, so my reference will be mainly my older canon eos 40D body.

take another little piece of my heart now, baby

build / ease of use

the camera feels solid and well-built. i’m careful about shooting in wet weather -- but i’ve been known to risk sea spray for a shot. its weather sealing means i feel a bit braver now.

i'm middle-aged and i have small hands. i appreciate the 6D’s small size and light weight. it’s so close to the 40D that i transitioned easily. i’m used to the feel of the camera now, and both bodies feel equally comfortable.

the buttons are in different spots, with its one-hand design, so there was a bit of initial awkwardness (especially since i’m left handed!), but after a month of use, it feels familiar and my hands know what to do. i’m very pleased with the high, newfangled level of customization for the buttons. i’ve played a bit with various configurations, and i’ve settled on something that’s comfortable and useful.

the menu is extensive, and it's been fun familiarizing myself with the possibilities it offers. it’s very thrilling, as it has controls that are brilliant and newly available. it’s also a source of never-ending fascination.

memory cards / batteries

my largish collection of CF cards is now reserved for the older camera body. i purchased two 32GB 95MB/s SD cards which, i believe, is all the capacity and speed i need... and i don’t have to worry about the card pins bending!

this camera has only one card slot but, in all honesty, i don’t miss the second slot. i’ve never had a card fail on me (and i don’t treat them very well) and i’m conscientious about backing up my files as soon as possible, so the probability of losing a shoot is minimal. i also speak from the perspective of not having to shoot once-in-a-lifetime events. i don’t do weddings or christenings to be too nervous about it... still, in previous years, nobody had double slots and they shot these events just fine. if i were to shoot a wedding, i’d span the day’s events over more cards so as not to risk losing too much if a card failed.

this camera body needs to use authentic canon batteries. third-party batteries won’t communicate their status to the camera, so you never know how much juice you have. the charger that came with my unit (LC-E6E) refuses to charge them. so follow my advice -- spend a bit more for original canon batteries and save yourself some grief.

file size/ image quality / ISO performance

this was the major factor for choosing this camera. i don’t have much to say about it other than i’m utterly pleased with what this sensor delivers. the 6D’s images are delicious and smooth -- complete nirvana.

i detest noise in my older camera -- so much so, that i’d rarely shoot over ISO200 unless is absolutely had to.  the 6D has completely liberated me in that department. i’ll happily shoot with higher values, in lower light, to my heart’s content. noise appears only at very high values, and it can be minimized easily in post. it eventually gets difficult to get rid of completely, but this is the first time i just don’t mind: the noise from this sensor is actually a pleasing grain, and i’ve actually elected to voluntarily leave it be in some pictures.

mithridatis and mentzelos on decks

the RAW file size is a lot larger than what i’m used to, but i purchased a new computer last year, with 16GB of memory and an SSD, so everything’s cool... i have no delay when processing.


my only issues with this camera is the AF system. this is the only feature that would make me want the 5DMIII.  the 6D has a cross-type autofocus point in the center only, whereas on my 40D, all nine points were cross-type.

the center point on this camera is brilliant for focusing -- it’s very sensitive and dependable, in all lighting conditions. if you tend to use the center point and recompose, you’ll be very happy. the problem is that i personally use the peripheral points for most of my shots, so they are important to me.

as my 40D had a cropped sensor, the AF points covered a larger area of the field of view. my shooting style was aided by this, as the four corner points were usually spot-on where i wanted to focus. on the 6D, however, the points are weighted towards the center, so i have to focus and recompose slightly.

the focusing system is fine when the subject isn’t moving a whole lot. my problems arise when i’m shooting live hip-hop performances. the light is low-to-flashing, the performers are in motion, and the peripheral points often simply refuse to focus. there’s no time to use the center point and recompose. this combination of conditions means i’m missing more (sometimes important) shots than i used to. i’m going to experiment with different approaches, and if i find a solution that works well, i’ll add it here the future.

GPS / WIFI / smartphone app

i love the GPS. it reported my images' to lightroom, google earth and flickr. i’m conscientious about geotagging on flickr, so this saved me time! i’ll definitely use it when out and about.

mix your paints in a broken cup

the wifi worked well with the android app on my nexus S, although it feels a bit slow. this is probably because the phone itself is not the zippiest. i haven’t tried to do some serious shooting with this yet, so expect more info in the future.

multiple exposures / HDR / picture styles / video

i’ve become very picky with my HDR techniques, so i’m not overly interested in the HDR processing, especially since it produces a JPG file. additionally, since always shoot RAW, i’ve never been attracted to picture styles either.

i’m very keen to try some artsy multiple-exposures, and i definitely would like to start with video. these are projects for the future, and i’m glad to have a camera that will support me in my future development.

… in conclusion...

i read elsewhere -- and i agree -- that the 6D offers 90% of the 5DMIII’s features at ⅔ the price. that’s an outstanding value in my book.

the 6D is a brilliant camera and i’m enjoying it immensely! i can’t wait to see what i can achieve with it.

if you’re interested in seeing what i’ve shot so far, then check out the images i tag with canon eos 6D on flickr.

do you have any questions i haven't covered? let me know in the comments, and i'll gladly add what i know to the text!


  1. Tony Locke11/2/13 00:39

    Great review! The magazines have been giving the 6D great reviews too, but not really a users point of view as good as yours. Thanks to my own 'current economic woes," I'm still shooting with my vintage 20D. It still delivers decent images, which I know could be better with a 6D, but yes, if I'm having to go to ISO200, I'm scared. Came across an original 5D with the 24-105L lens for a great price, but it was a pro photographer that does a lot of weddings and studio work, so I'm sure it's got a lot of shutter cycles on it. Talked to Santa about the 6D or maybe even a 7D, but she's not listening. Enjoy your new camera, looking forward to your new experiments. Tony

  2. What do you mean by "recompose" when you are focusing?

    If you wanted the right hand of you photo in focus, would you first centre that in the camera to focus, and then move the camera so that focus point is to the right of the frame?

  3. John Godfrey11/2/13 05:10

    Thanks Helen. Love your work. I also have a new 6D and work in RAW, so your review matches what I've felt as well. (I came from a 1000D.) 

    And yes, the new ISO range is wonderful, though I've been caught by the camera not slowing the shutter speed as much as I expected in Av mode, so I lost the blur I wanted... (My old max ISO was 800.) Have you noticed this?
    In playing, while I don't often use HDR, I snapped a skateboarder using AEB (-1 to +1 exposure) and merged the 3 in Photomatix.  Came up very natural with a sense of motion. I think it worked because he was wearing a white t-shirt. Made me realise there are opportunities to use HDR type techniques not necessarily to increase dynamic range but to merge multiple images and using exposure to highlight one particular instance of a moving object against a static background. 

  4. i haven't noticed any changes in shutter speed in Av mode.  now that you mention it, i'll do a comparison between the two bodies.

    the idea you have with the skateboarder is interesting. i assume multiple exposure wouldn't produce the same effect, because you can set photomatix to avoid ghosting...?

  5. yes, that's exactly what i mean. place the center AF point on the desired point of focus, press your shutter halfway so that it focuses, and then move the camera over to recompose your shot. finally, press the shutter button all the way down to complete the shot.

  6. Christian Campo11/2/13 19:41

    Hi Helen,

    I feel the same as you (wanting a full-frame) still there is not that much money in my pocket. And I am not a professional to justify it. I used to have a 30D and now I use a 7D.

    Two thinks I have as question. How do you get a long with your focal length now being different. (objects are more far away with full frame) ? Does that bother you ? Do you need new lenses ?

    Second thing is that I personally have a lot of EF-S lenses which dont work on full frames. Actually I only realized 1 year ago that only EF work on full frame bodies. What about you ? Did you always only use EF because you had this move in mind ? Or do EF-S lenses also work on the 6D but not on the 5D III ?


  7. Christian Campo11/2/13 19:43

    Is there a public link for that photo ? Sounds interesting....

  8. i have been looking forward to having a wider field with my lenses for a long time. i felt too restricted on the cropped sensor, so i'm very glad to have extra space, especially on the 50mm and the 70-200mm!

    no, EF-S lenses don't work on the 6D.i have only one EF-S lens: the canon 10-22 mm. this is the lens i use for most of my landscape shots. i bought it before i knew that it wasn't compatible with full-frame cameras, and as soon as i learned of this issue, i avoided buying any more EF-S lenses, because i wanted to eventually move to a full-frame.after i've recovered from purchasing this camera, i'll look into buying a new wide-angle lens. until then, i'll either use it on my old body, or i'll use my fisheye lens for 'scapes.

    if i had a lot of EF-S lenses, with my limited budget, i think i wouldn't be able to move to full-frame very easily or cheaply.

  9. Christian Campo11/2/13 20:55

    I also have the 10-22mm. What other lenses do you have or use most ?

  10. this is a list of my lenses i prepared some time ago:

    canon EF 15mm f/2.8 fisheyecanon EFS 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USMcanon EF 50mm f/1.8 IIcanon EF 50mm f/1.4 USMcanon EF 100mm f/2.8 USM macrocanon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L USMcanon EF 2x II extender sigma 18-200 f/3.5-6.3

    i use the 50mm f/1.4 a LOT because it's small and it's almost always on my camera. the others depend on what i'm shooting. the 100 if i'm doing macros, the 100 or 50 or 70-200 for portraits, and the 10-22 for landscapes (now replaced by the fisheye). for concerts i use the 50 and the fisheye because i'm very close to the performers.

    i almost never use the extender :P

  11. Thanks for the reply.  Sounds like something I could live with, but I see your point that it might be slowing if you are shooting a live performance.

  12. it's the nature of this specific type of performance. other -- calmer -- concerts would be perfectly fine.

  13. Thanks for review, it was excellent and very informative.
    as a first time visitor to your blog I am very impressed.
    thank you :)

  14. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.