windless in nafplion

like it? click it!
the main shopping street at nafplion in june.
thank goodness it's friday.
the candle flame gutters. its little pool of light trembles. darkness gathers. the demons begin to stir. - carl sagan

like it? click it!
the main shopping street at nafplion in june.
thank goodness it's friday.

like it? click it!
i think this is a little juvenile, but i've been spending too much time indoors, in the office... just trying to brighten up my day.
it's fun sometimes to play with the white balance settings on DPP.
'richard dawkins explains how vestigial organs like the stubby wings of the flightless cormorant were one of earwin's key arguments for evolution.'
via RD

like it? click it, then...!
i've been double-tagged on flickr... by apenrade and westie4us.
so... here are 10 riveting things about me:
1. i played lacrosse in high school -- very badly.
2. i wear almost exclusively black.
3. my favorite city is san francisco.
4. some kinds of amorphous jazz can make me physically ill.
5. do not push my nose down. i will not rest until i push it back up.
6. i was once the family cow, nursing my baby for almost three years.
7. i'm left-handed, -footed, -eyed and -eared.
8. i don't have a superstitious bone in my body.
9. i'm a pessimist.
10. i dream in science-fiction.
so, to tag, my ten victims choices are:
Tony₂
richard.heeks
T Does Wool
tommy...c
kounelli
Jenny [海外遠征中]
daruma*
Ashu Mittal
5erg10
and...
Re(Becca) Tabor Armstrong
mojoey has a knack for gathering the power of atheist bloggers on the internet, as seen by his almsot 1000-member-at-the-moment atheist blogroll. as an added treat, he organizes a photography contest for members of the blogroll.... plus members of atheist nexus.
categories for the images are:
atheism/religion
travel and people
self-portrait
altered images
the natural world
the deadline is september 15th -- rules and details, at deep thoughts!
sam harris discusses the recent nomination of francis collins to be the next director of the national institutes of health in the united states.
'as someone who believes that our understanding of human nature can be derived from neuroscience, psychology, cognitive science and behavioral economics, among others, i am troubled by dr. collins’s line of thinking. i also believe it would seriously undercut fields like neuroscience and our growing understanding of the human mind. if we must look to religion to explain our moral sense, what should we make of the deficits of moral reasoning associated with conditions like frontal lobe syndrome and psychopathy? are these disorders best addressed by theology?
dr. collins has written that “science offers no answers to the most pressing questions of human existence” and that “the claims of atheistic materialism must be steadfastly resisted.”
one can only hope that these convictions will not affect his judgment at the institutes of health. after all, understanding human well-being at the level of the brain might very well offer some “answers to the most pressing questions of human existence” — questions like, why do we suffer? or, indeed, is it possible to love one’s neighbor as oneself? and wouldn’t any effort to explain human nature without reference to a soul, and to explain morality without reference to god, necessarily constitute “atheistic materialism”?
francis collins is an accomplished scientist and a man who is sincere in his beliefs. and that is precisely what makes me so uncomfortable about his nomination. must we really entrust the future of biomedical research in the united states to a man who sincerely believes that a scientific understanding of human nature is impossible?'
the entire piece is here.
'female domestic cats tend to preferentially use their right front paw while male cats more often rely upon their left front paw, according to a new study that suggests the sex of a cat determines how its brain will be wired.
the findings also add to a growing body of evidence that male animals tend to be left-handed, or in this case left-pawed, more often than females. while 90 percent of all humans are right-handed, of the remaining southpaws, more tend to be men.
the differences are even clearer among cats.'
read the rest on discovery news.
via teachers dude's BBQ:
in an article in kathimerini.gr, regarding communion procedures which use a common silver spoon for everyone (loosely translated):
'there is also a great deal of confusion about holy protection. when asked if the virus can spread during holy communion, archbishop ieronimos replied that 'these are holy issues and theology and are not to be discussed', but eparch anthimos says that the utensils are made of silver, which kills germs.'

like it? click it!
amethystos comes from the greek words a- (not) and methystos (drunk).
wikipedia says:
'amethyst was considered to be a strong antidote against drunkenness, which is why wine goblets were often carved from it. in greek mythology, dionysus, the god of intoxication, was pursuing a maiden named amethystos, who refused his affections. amethystos prayed to the gods to remain chaste, which the goddess artemis granted and transformed her into a white stone. humbled by amethystos's desire to remain chaste, dionysus poured wine over the stone as an offering, dyeing the crystals purple.'
it's easily one of my favorite stones. when i see amethystos, as pronounced in greek, i always imagine it to be a white crystal doused in wine.
i'm wearing this bracelet these days -- it was a gift from last christmas. the offspring got one too.
amateur astronomer anthony wesley found a new scar on jupiter:
click pic to source on apod
this is a great image... and so similar an idea to the opening sequence of the movie, contact:
click pic to view properly at its source at abstruse goose
a great movie of the scans of enceladus by brent buffington on the cassini navigation team.
via JPL and reposted in full:

video description:
'this panel discussion took place at a center for inquiry - new york city conference titled "secular society and its enemies." the panel discusses a wide variety of topics, including, science, science education, the nature of science, the correct political methodology and much more.
richard dawkins, neil degrasse tyson, ann druyan and victor stenger. moderated by d.j. grothe.
recorded by bluewater media llc.'
i'm really looking forward to seeing this -- it's going to be a treat.
it takes a while to load for some reason -- or else, see it at danwei
by thunderf00t

like it? give it a click, then!
near the end of a too-hot weekend, we went to vouliagmeni for dinner. mr.g had a late-evening swim and the offspring re-read a harry potter. me, i shot a few.
more spheres!
i've placed this image on the map at the original flickr page.
i was 7 when three human beings, the crew of apollo 11, went to the moon. i remember being riveted to my television set... and my imagination soared.
click pic to source
the imagery of the time says more than i could ever write. we saw what determination, cooperation, ingenuity and the highest ethics can achieve. we aimed the lenses back to ourselves and saw our home from afar. our self-perception was forever changed.
now that i think about it, i can hardly believe the depth of the sense of wonder, enthusiasm and pride in our fellow humans that a child of 7 can have. little humans are sponges and they soak up the best and worst of what they see.



i watched the apollo missions. walter cronkite showed them to me and we were excited together.
...and that's the way it is...
that mitchell and web look -- brilliant
via pharyngula

like it? click it!
much has been written about the acropolis museum, and of the building itself. i found it to be beautiful, even as it serves as a background for its exhibits.
more from the acropolis museum






the caryatids as seen through the glass floor from above:

uploaded and analyzed by the bad astronomer!
do YOU remember this? i do!

like it? click it!
out of all the custom shaped bokeh i've tried, i think i like the simplicity of square the best. you can find a recipe for custom shapes on my snowberries photo.
ruby γλυκειά
έλα ξανά
έλα ξανά κοντά μου
έλα πρωί
σαν την αυτή
χρυσή σαν ηλιαχτίδα
ruby μου μικρή
-cat stevens
tr:
ruby glykeia (ruby my sweet)
ela xana (come again)
ela xana konta mou (come again close to me)
ela proi (come in the morning)
me tin avgi (by dawn)
hrisi san iliahtida (gold as a sunbeam)
ruby mou mikri (my little ruby)
i like these videos -- richard dawkins goes through a bunch of misunderstandings about science and evolution.
this time, 'if we're descended from monkeys, why are there still monkeys?'
via RD
from the video description:
'clips from the 1939 porky pig cartoon "old glory"
notice how "under god" is not in the pledge,neither in the book he's reading,or when he recites it.
thats because "under god" was wrongly added in 1954.'

like it? click it!
i think i love blue on a flower more than any other color. these have appeared around the neighborhood lately and i got a few decent shots, even though it was fairly breezy and i had no tripod.
this is the first image i've processed with a texture -- i like the way it turned out and it was easy and fun. i used max f. william's dol guldur texture from his layered textures set.
two more closeups, with no texture:


if you like the picture, please click it... comments follow
i heard this interview of richard dawkins at WNYC radiolab entitled 'in defense of darwin' this morning and it fit perfectly with the picture i shot yesterday.
i took the time to write down a bit of the interview here...
---------
Q: your daughter is driving around with you and you look and… she’s 6 years old. she sees a field of flowers. you say to her, well, what do you think they’re for? she says 'well, to make the world pretty and to help bees make honey for us. and you think, well, i’m sorry to tell her that this wasn’t true. and i explained to her that the flowers are not there to make the world beautiful and they are not there to delight bees or anything else. they’re in the world to copy their DNA.'
this is to a six-year old.
(audience laughs)
but essentially what you’re doing there is you’re addressing you’re opening the notion to her that the world is a purposeless, indifferent machine where the meaning of things is not clear, if it exists at all. you’ve found it, i think, kind of brave to say to your daughter , look, step into the wind…
(richard interrupts)
A: no, exciting! it’s a far more exciting view of flowers to understand what they’re really doing and, as six years old, she had no problem understanding that. i explained it to her.
but to come to your ‘what’s it for’ question, it’s a piece of massive presumption to think that the ‘what it’s for’ question deserves an answer. there’s no reason at all why something should have a ‘for’ about it. if i said to you, ‘what is the sun for?’ or 'what is mt. everest for', you would say 'don’t be so silly... it’s not an appropriate question'… but, because it’s flowers, you sort of feel there ought to be a ‘what is it for’ question.
Q: no actually i think it’s a harder question than that. i think most human beings have some deep impulse to explain their being here to wonder about the origins of here and the destiny of them and here. and that question, the meaning of it all is not a silly question.
A: that’s not a silly question and it has a perfectly good answer, which is not an answer to be couched in the language of purpose. it’s an answer to be couched in the language of scientific causation. what brought us all to be here… what is the explanation for our existence… that has a perfectly good scientific answer… and you go back in evolutionary time to the origin of life, and you go back before the origin of life to the origin of the world, the origin of the solar system, the origin of the universe… and that becomes deeply mysterious. needless to say, it’s not a question i could even begin to answer and i don’t think that, at the present stage, physics can either. but to the extent that there’s going to be an answer, it’s going to come from science and that is a deeply satisfying kind of answer to the question, 'why are we here?' we already have, in principle, the answer to that question and it is not an answer of the form ‘we are here in order to achieve some purpose’ it’s an answer of the form, ‘we are here because something happened, which led that something else that happened, which led to something else that happened'.
Q: are you … let me ask you the harder question … is this hard-looking and this telling your 6-year old, this leads to this leads to this, this kind of reductionist way of thinking about everything … does that seem to you to be less than joyously imaginative ?
A: no, i think that’s kind of super-romantic to actually understand that flowers are devices … beautiful devices, elegant devices which are shaped precisely to attract insects and hummingbirds and bats to take pollen from one to another… that is such a mind-blowing thought compared to the tame, sort of washed-out view that flowers are just sort of nice things to have around.’
(audience claps)
interviewer to audience: 'don’t encourage him.'
on charlie rose.
i may have posted this before... but it's so important to think about:
thanks for reminding me, george.
'it is a wretched, backward, uncivilised regression to the middle ages. who was the bright spark who thought to besmirch the revered name of ireland by proposing anything so stupid?' - richard dawkins (via RD)
i just discovered ZJemptv and i'm enjoying listening to her videos.
by joe e. holman, at debunking christianity:
'you are wounded, oh religion.
the still-warm blood runs down your side as you say it did your savior on the cross.
my soldiers in white coats have maimed you.
they have crippled you, leaving you to limp away a casualty from the battlefield.
and now, on the loser’s end, with my chipped and crimson sword laid at your throat, you plead for mercy.
you beg me to spare your life.
you ask for compassion and for understanding from me, science.
you want to be held up and accepted.
know that i, science, have no obligation to hear you.
better it is that you should die, as all things old and decrepit.
but out of compassion and mercy, i grant you what you seek.'
read the rest here...

like it? click it!
when i visited the acropolis museum a couple of weeks ago, i naturally intended to be able to return for more shots. unfortunately, photographs will now be restricted to the top level at the parthenon gallery. i understand that the exhibits have to be protected, but i don't agree with the measure.
i'll keep posting the images i have already, although i was hoping to reshoot some of the ones i'm not satisfied with. at least i can do the same for the parthenon exhibit.


more from the acropolis museum

like it? click it!
a tiny portable chess set bought at beijing's touristy yashow market -- one of the souvenirs i look at from time to time to remind me that i was there.
i suffer great disconnect between the places i've lived... at times i suspect i've imagined them. i know it sounds funny, but sometimes i look down on my old neighborhoods on google earth to reassure myself that they really, truly exist.
if i go back to visit, even after decade's absence, it feels as if nothing's changed and it's as if i never left.
has anyone else noticed that there are ads for scientology everywhere?
it smells of desperation to me.
there goes the tab at the top theory.
video via lifehacker
here's the great ray comfort - matt dillahunty debate:

like it? click it!
alternate title: what's black and white and unread all over?
i stopped buying newspapers years ago.
i think i probably wouldn't have noticed this arrangement if i hadn't seen flickrfanmk2007's picture yesterday.

like it? click it!
i was fiddling around with my remote live view on the 40D again last night -- it was a full moon, after all, and i do have a tradition of photographing the full moon. i mounted my little white onto the 40D, set it on the tripod on the balcony and connected it to my computer with two USB extensions.
you can really see the moon move on the EOS utility magnification window... and i got this idea for something a little different.
the offspring suggested i make some moon candy:

like it? click it!
yesterday mr.g presented me with this LG M2794D monitor (which doubles as a TV) -- and i went from seeing my pictures on a 15something inch laptop screen to 27''!
my personal favorites flickr slideshow looks awesome.
the picture is not too clear -- i softened it up because the depth of field on the pixels was distracting...

click pic to source
susan sackett, author of several books, including inside trek, and gene roddenberry's executive assistant for 17 years, chats with d.j. grothe on point of inquiry. she discusses what star trek is truly about -- it was a great podcast to listen to.
i also saw that the post's commentators complain about the latest star trek -- i've posted my review here.

like it? click it!
i wanted a perfect ending.
now i've learned, the hard way, that some poems don't rhyme, and some stories don't have a clear beginning, middle, and end.
life is about not knowing, having to change, taking the moment and making the best of it, without knowing what's going to happen next.
delicious ambiguity.
- gilda radner
says nick farrantello at the humanist, beautifully expressing my thoughts, exactly.
click image to source
i searched the whole thing to see if i could find a better bit to quote here, but no, the friendly atheist nailed it:
'when you first watch star trek it’s this campy sci-fi show that occasionally takes some not-so-subtle potshots at religion. at a very young age it made me question the nature of god even to the point of questioning his (her or its) very existence. and it showed me that those questions were okay to pose, that there were other people out there like me, asking the same questions. but then roddenberry’s campy little show goes so much farther. it explores what it means to be human. it is a message of hope for the future of our species and an expression of pride in all of humanity. through it, i learned that although people aren’t perfect, it is that striving to be better (the voyage) that makes us special. the show helped me realize that i control my own future—me, a speck in the universe. i began to understand that each and every person posseses potential, that within all of us there is the seed of greatness waiting to be nurtured, and that someday we may each be able to tap into that potential greatness, that…humanity. (i hope you read that last line the way shatner would have.)'
- nick farrantello
take time to read the rest.
it's not ok to dismiss star trek as a cheesy space opera and to liken it to star wars and today's computer generated space battles. if you want stories you can really sink your teeth into, watch the original series and the next generation.

like it? click it!
two buildings obstruct the view between the acropolis museum and the acropolis itself, at the lower levels. this is a detail from one of them.
why haven't they been demolished? because they're historically valuable in their own rite. one art deco, one neoclassical (incidentally owned by vangelis), they were initially characterized and protected as historical buildings -- but their status has now changed.
it's a dilemma: some say that a direct line of vision for the acropolis and its museum takes precedence, and others believe that you can't seriously respect history yet destroy these works.
i could conceivably understand an argument for transferring them elsewhere -- otherwise, my view is that they should stay.
more info on ekathimerini and welcome to the new acropolis museum.
for this shot i was inspired by this lovely image by tasosdimo.
i've added its location on the map on my original flickr page.

like it? why don't you click it then?
these days, i
hit 3000 posts on my blog
completed 1/2 year of my 365 project
celebrate my 47th birthday
and i'm feeling a bit tired.
'time it was and what a time it was it was,
a time of innocence a time of confidences.
long ago it must be, i have a photograph
preserve your memories, they're all that's left you'
- bookends, simon & garfunkel
geometry on clay:
like it? click it!
one thing about athens -- dig anywhere, and you'll find ancient artifacts.
the first space within the acropolis museum is a wide ramp with exhibits of objects discovered in the area. the slope is meant to remind us of the ascent to the acropolis, or sacred rock, itself. glass displays flank the hall and the repeating motif of glass floors reveal fascinating displays underneath. excavations in the area have uncovered clay vessels for food, toys, various household items and statues for worship.
overview:
this is thousands of years of urban life in athens, an uninterrupted settlement from the neolithic period (3000 BC)to about the 6th century AD. these objects speak volumes -- communicating people's lives through time to us.
two terracotta nike statues, 1st-3rd c.AD:
i often wonder how daily life has changed here -- and i suspect that the basic traditions and habits are pretty much the same.
fragments of a civilization: